Colorado Files🔍 Search

People › Judges

Allison P. Ernst

District Court Judge, 10th Judicial District

Running in 2026: District Court Judge, 10th Judicial District (November 3)

Judicial performance evaluation, 2026

Commission recommendation: Meets performance standards (8–2) · 8 of 10 commissioners voted “meets”

The commission's narrative

The Tenth Judicial District Commission on Judicial Performance agrees by a vote of 8-2, that Judge Allison P. Ernst MEETS PERFORMANCE STANDARDS .

Judge Ernst presides over criminal cases as well as runs the Competency Court Docket in Pueblo, County which she was instrumental in implementing. Judge demonstrated a commitment to serving individuals with mental health needs, particularly through her work on competency matters. Judge Ernst’s demeanor is described as professional, respectful, compassionate, and thoughtful. She is diligent, knowledgeable, and thorough. Judge Ernst strives to make the right decisions, uphold the law, and ensure due process. Judge Ernst is very motivated and is involved in the legal community serving on numerous judicial committees and councils. Judge Ernst’s opinions reflect her knowledge of the law and are evidence of her ongoing learning by proactively educating herself and staying well informed of changes in the law. There is some concern that the judge’s sentencing practices may, at times, be more lenient than typical for comparable cases, with outcomes leaning toward the lower end of the range in certain matters. This has raised questions about consistency and proportionality, as well as whether those decisions consistently align with the seriousness of the offense, broader considerations of public safety, and public confidence in the judicial system.

The Commission conducted a personal interview with Judge Ernst, reviewed opinions she authored, observed her in court, and reviewed judicial performance survey responses from attorneys and non-attorneys who had interaction in Judge Ernst’s court. A total of four (4) attorneys and ten (10) non attorneys responded to the judicial performance surveys expressing their opinion of Judge Ernst. The Commission found the survey responses consistent with their independent evaluations. Based on these findings a majority of the Commission agreed that Judge Ernst meets performance standards.

Judge Ernst was appointed to the District Court in December 2016. She obtained both her undergraduate and law degree from Michigan State University. Directly after law school, Judge Ernst was awarded an Equal Justice Works Fellowship with Michigan State University’s Low Income Taxpayer Clinic. She then moved to Colorado and was hired by the Colorado State Public Defender’s Office in 2005 and worked as a public defender until 2011 at which time transition to private practice until she was appointed to the District Court.

1300 Broadway, Suite 220 Denver, Colorado 80203

(303) 928-7777

The evaluation on judicialperformance.colorado.gov · 2026 Retention Survey Report (PDF) · 2023 Interim Survey Report (PDF)

From the state's Office of Judicial Performance Evaluation. A commission of citizens, attorneys and non-attorneys for each judicial district (the state commission for appellate judges) reviews each judge standing for retention and finds that they meet, or do not meet, performance standards. Voters decide.

Personal Financial Disclosures

Income listed: up to $425,000; debts: up to $327,000 on their latest disclosure with entries: the top of each range they selected, added up (the form asks for ranges, not amounts; a range with no top counts at its figure).

StatementFiledWhat it lists
2024
Court Judge 10th Judicial District
2024-01-165 income sources, 1 colorado property, 4 debts

Findings

Worth a look Late or missing

No annual disclosure found for 2026

As a judge, they file a disclosure by January 10 each year. We found none for 2026 in TRACER's Document Search under their name.

What to check
  • TRACER's Document Search under their name (a different spelling could hide one).
  • Whether they held the office that January (members seated, or judges appointed, later in the year file on taking office).
Rule: An annual disclosure after January 10, or none found
“The following state officials must file a PFD by January 10th each year 24-6-202(1), C.R.S.”Form CPF-13 (Rev. 06/2026), instructions: Annual Filing Requirements ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Worth a look Late or missing

No annual disclosure found for 2025

As a judge, they file a disclosure by January 10 each year. We found none for 2025 in TRACER's Document Search under their name.

What to check
  • TRACER's Document Search under their name (a different spelling could hide one).
  • Whether they held the office that January (members seated, or judges appointed, later in the year file on taking office).
Rule: An annual disclosure after January 10, or none found
“The following state officials must file a PFD by January 10th each year 24-6-202(1), C.R.S.”Form CPF-13 (Rev. 06/2026), instructions: Annual Filing Requirements ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Context Income · the statement

No income from their office as District Court Judge, 10th Judicial District on their 2024 disclosure

They hold office as District Court Judge, 10th Judicial District, which pays a salary, and their 2024 disclosure lists 5 sources of income (unnamed; Wells Fargo Investments; Odyssey; DFAS; VA) but none that is the office. The form asks for every source of income, an employer included.

What to check
  • The disclosure itself: whether the salary is listed under another name, or in an attachment.
  • Whether they took office after the year the disclosure covers (an appointment late in the year).
Rule: No income listed from the office they hold
“List the names of any sources of income, including capital gains (whether or not taxable) for yourself, your spouse, and minor children residing with you.”Form CPF-13 (Rev. 06/2026), instructions: Income ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works