Colorado Files🔍 Search

People › Judges

Craig Peter Henderson

District Court Judge, 21st Judicial District

Running in 2026: District Court Judge, 21st Judicial District (November 3)

Judicial performance evaluation, 2026

Commission recommendation: Meets performance standards (8–0) · 8 of 8 commissioners voted “meets”

The commission's narrative

The Twenty-First Judicial District Judicial Performance Commission unanimously by a vote of 8-0 finds that Judge Craig Peter Henderson MEETS PERFORMANCE STANDARDS . The Commission has one vacancy and one absent commissioner.

By all accounts Judge Henderson has made a smooth transition from being a county court judge to a district court judge. Judge Henderson demonstrates high levels of integrity and good communications skills. Judge Henderson cares about the people in his courtroom as people, not just cases he needs to get through. He takes the time to ensure parties understand what is happening in the courtroom. In criminal cases, he speaks to the defendants to ensure they understand the seriousness of their misconduct while also encouraging them to do better. Judge Henderson has worked throughout his career to improve his judicial temperament and now receives high marks in this area. Judge Henderson has improved his case handling to ensure cases are completed in a timely fashion but has received mixed reviews on issuing timely orders and managing his courtroom schedule. Judge Henderson has recognized his need to continue improving his docketing and calendar management. Judge Henderson has generally been complimented for his legal knowledge but has expressed his own desire for more training in domestic relations, dependency and neglect, and some civil matters and is looking to work such training into his schedule. Overall, the Commission believes that Judge Henderson meets performance standards and is a credit to the bench.

In reaching these conclusions, the Commission considered several sources of information. The Commission considered survey results, case management information, and Judge Henderson’s self-evaluation. The Commission also interviewed attorneys and the Judge, observed Judge Henderson in court, and read opinions he authored. The survey results and interviews were largely consistent with Judge Henderson’s self-evaluation. While there were only 20 survey respondents, they unanimously agreed that Judge Henderson was meeting performance standards.

Judge Craig P. Henderson grew up on the eastern plains of Colorado. He graduated from McPherson College and received his law degree from Washburn University, both in Kansas. In his career as a lawyer, Judge Henderson was mostly a prosecutor but also did a small amount of private practice. He made Mesa County his home in 2002 and worked for the Mesa County District Attorney’s Office as a prosecutor. He was appointed as a Mesa County Court Judge by Governor Bill Owens in 2006 and as a District Court Judge by Governor Jared Polis in 2024.

1300 Broadway, Suite 220 Denver, Colorado 80203

(303) 928-7777

The evaluation on judicialperformance.colorado.gov · 2026 Retention Survey Report (PDF) · 2025 Interim Survey Report (PDF)

From the state's Office of Judicial Performance Evaluation. A commission of citizens, attorneys and non-attorneys for each judicial district (the state commission for appellate judges) reviews each judge standing for retention and finds that they meet, or do not meet, performance standards. Voters decide.

Personal Financial Disclosures

Income listed: up to $309,997; debts: up to $219,995 on their latest disclosure with entries: the top of each range they selected, added up (the form asks for ranges, not amounts; a range with no top counts at its figure).

StatementFiledWhat it lists
2026
District Court Judge 21st Judicial District
2026-01-063 income sources, 4 assets, 4 colorado property, 5 debts
2025 Annual
District Court Judge
2025-01-023 income sources, 4 assets, 3 colorado property, 4 debts
2024
7
2024-01-084 income sources, 2 sources of compensation, 1 compensated lobbying, 5 assets, 2 colorado property, 2 offices and directorships, 1 state-regulated businesses, 2 debts

Findings

Context Errors in the record

1 error in their public record: a disclosure that doesn't say why it was filed

We found these in the records as filed or as TRACER lists them, and read each as meant (shown here so anyone can check the reading): Their 2026 disclosure doesn't say why it was filed: none of the boxes (appointed, candidate, annual filing, amending) is ticked.

What to check
  • The original filing in TRACER for each one.
  • These don't change what we show: we use the amount, name or date as meant.
Rule: Errors in the record

How this rule works