People › Judges
Matthew Thomas Berumen
County Court Judge, Las Animas County
Personal Financial Disclosures
Income listed: up to $199,999; debts: up to $149,999 on their latest disclosure with entries: the top of each range they selected, added up (the form asks for ranges, not amounts; a range with no top counts at its figure).
| Statement | Filed | What it lists |
|---|
2026
Las Animas County Court Judge | 2026-02-16 | 1 income sources, 4 assets, 2 colorado property, 1 offices and directorships, 1 debts |
Findings
Worth a look Late or missing
No annual disclosure found for 2025
As a judge, they file a disclosure by January 10 each year. We found none for 2025 in TRACER's Document Search under their name.
What to check- TRACER's Document Search under their name (a different spelling could hide one).
- Whether they held the office that January (members seated, or judges appointed, later in the year file on taking office).
Rule: An annual disclosure after January 10, or none found
“The following state officials must file a PFD by January 10th each year 24-6-202(1), C.R.S.”Form CPF-13 (Rev. 06/2026), instructions: Annual Filing Requirements ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works
Context Late or missing
Their 2026 annual disclosure is dated February 16, 2026, after the January 10 deadline
As a judge, they file a disclosure by January 10 each year (January 10, 2026 was a Saturday, so we count January 12, 2026 as on time). The first we found for 2026 in TRACER's Document Search is dated February 16, 2026, 35 days after the deadline.
What to check- Whether they took office after January 10 that year (an appointment or a new judgeship).
- The document's date in TRACER is the date it was received or entered.
Rule: An annual disclosure after January 10, or none found
“The following state officials must file a PFD by January 10th each year 24-6-202(1), C.R.S.”Form CPF-13 (Rev. 06/2026), instructions: Annual Filing Requirements ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works
Context Errors in the record
1 error in their public record: a disclosure that doesn't say why it was filed
We found these in the records as filed or as TRACER lists them, and read each as meant (shown here so anyone can check the reading): Their 2026 disclosure doesn't say why it was filed: none of the boxes (appointed, candidate, annual filing, amending) is ticked.
What to check- The original filing in TRACER for each one.
- These don't change what we show: we use the amount, name or date as meant.
Rule: Errors in the record
How this rule works