Colorado Files🔍 Search

People › Judges

Nicholas Catanzarite

County Court Judge, Grand County

Running in 2026: County Court Judge, Grand County (November 3)

Judicial performance evaluation, 2026

Commission recommendation: Meets performance standards (7–0) · 7 of 7 commissioners voted “meets”

The commission's narrative

The Fourteenth Judicial District Judicial Performance Commission unanimously agrees 7-0, with three commission vacancies, that Judge Nicholas Catanzarite MEETS PERFORMANCE STANDARDS .

The Commission personally interviewed Judge Catanzarite, observed him in Court, reviewed judicial performance data, written orders, survey responses, and reviewed a self-evaluation completed by his Honor. It was clear from the interview that Judge Catanzarite has grown significantly in his role since 2015 and excels as a valuable judicial officer in the 14th Judicial District. The Commission was disappointed by the lack of participation in the survey results and would encourage the public to participate in the future. Survey responses were statistically unrepresentative and lacked sufficient context to provide meaningful feedback to the Commission. Judge Catanzarite handles a combined docket of traffic cases, civil disputes including small claims, criminal, and misdemeanor cases. Judge Catanzarite possesses an excellent judicial temperament and treats those in his courtroom with patience and respect. He demonstrates a breadth of legal knowledge and has developed strong processes supporting judicial efficiency. Judge Catanzarite displays good control of his courtroom with pro se and represented litigants alike. The Commission is pleased that Judge Catanzarite has embraced virtual courtroom proceedings to support accessibility of the Courts. The Commission encourages Judge Catanzarite to require video appearance (as opposed to audio-only) whenever possible to promote traditional standards of decorum. Judge Catanzarite has developed his skill in delivering oral rulings for expediency and continues to strengthen his organization and clarity in oral rulings. The Commission commends his Honor for the quality of his written rulings as well. Judge Catanzarite has also demonstrated leadership in the judiciary as part of the CourtCall pilot program and addressing pro se litigants’ increasing use of Artificial Intelligence to generate pleadings which can strain judicial resources. The Commission appreciates his more than a decade of service to the 14th Judicial District and finds Judge Catanzarite ranks high in demeanor, control, fairness, and efficiency.

Based on all the aforementioned considerations, the Judicial Performance Commission recommends that Judge Catanzarite meets performance standards.

Judge Nicholas Catanzarite was appointed to Grand County Court in 2015. Prior to his appointment to County Judge, he practiced law in Grand County for 3 years with a focus on criminal defense, real estate, and family law. Judge Catanzarite earned his undergraduate degree from Michigan State University and his Juris Doctorate from the University of Denver in 2011.

1300 Broadway, Suite 220 Denver, Colorado 80203

(303) 928-7777

The evaluation on judicialperformance.colorado.gov · 2026 Retention Survey Report (PDF) · 2025 Interim Survey Report (PDF)

From the state's Office of Judicial Performance Evaluation. A commission of citizens, attorneys and non-attorneys for each judicial district (the state commission for appellate judges) reviews each judge standing for retention and finds that they meet, or do not meet, performance standards. Voters decide.

Colorado property

1 parcel we matched to the property on their disclosures.

KindCountyAssessor's value
property—not given

The county assessor's actual value (the 2025 reappraisal, an estimate of market value in mid-2024), from the state's parcel records. We match parcels by the owner's name where their office or race is, or by the legal description or address on their disclosure; we don't show addresses, parcel numbers or co-owners, or, for judges and district attorneys, the county. Property held in a name we can't connect to them isn't here.

Personal Financial Disclosures

Income listed: up to $284,996; debts: up to $799,997 on their latest disclosure with entries: the top of each range they selected, added up (the form asks for ranges, not amounts; a range with no top counts at its figure).

StatementFiledWhat it lists
2026
County Judge
2026-01-114 income sources, 1 assets, 6 colorado property, 3 debts
2025 Annual
County Judge
2025-01-164 income sources, 1 assets, 3 colorado property, 2 debts
2024 Annual
County Judge
2024-01-104 income sources, 1 assets, 3 colorado property, 2 debts

Findings

Context Errors in the record

1 error in their public record: a disclosure that doesn't say why it was filed

We found these in the records as filed or as TRACER lists them, and read each as meant (shown here so anyone can check the reading): Their 2026 disclosure doesn't say why it was filed: none of the boxes (appointed, candidate, annual filing, amending) is ticked.

What to check
  • The original filing in TRACER for each one.
  • These don't change what we show: we use the amount, name or date as meant.
Rule: Errors in the record

How this rule works

Context Late or missing

Their 2025 annual disclosure is dated January 16, 2025, after the January 10 deadline

As a judge, they file a disclosure by January 10 each year. The first we found for 2025 in TRACER's Document Search is dated January 16, 2025, 6 days after the deadline.

What to check
  • Whether they took office after January 10 that year (an appointment or a new judgeship).
  • The document's date in TRACER is the date it was received or entered.
Rule: An annual disclosure after January 10, or none found
“The following state officials must file a PFD by January 10th each year 24-6-202(1), C.R.S.”Form CPF-13 (Rev. 06/2026), instructions: Annual Filing Requirements ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works