Races › Judges
Court of Appeals Judge
November 3, 2026 general: a yes/no retention vote
| Candidate | Disclosure | Findings | Raised | Their own | Spent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth L. Harris incumbent Meets performance standards (9–0) | 2026 Annual 4 income sources, 5 assets, 4 colorado property, 3 offices and directorships, 4 debts | — | — | — | — |
| Grant Sullivan incumbent Meets performance standards (9–0) | 2026 Annual 2 income sources, 7 assets, 4 colorado property, 2 offices and directorships, 1 debts | — | — | — | — |
| Karl L. Schock incumbent Meets performance standards (9–0) | 2026 Annual 6 income sources, 6 assets, 2 colorado property, 2 debts | — | — | — | — |
| Katharine E. Lum incumbent Meets performance standards (9–0) | 2026 6 income sources, 6 assets, 4 colorado property, 3 offices and directorships, 1 state-regulated businesses, 5 debts | — | — | — | — |
| Pax Moultrie incumbent Meets performance standards (9–0) | 2026 2 income sources, 3 assets, 1 colorado property, 1 offices and directorships, 2 state-regulated businesses, 6 debts | — | — | — | — |
| Rebecca Rankin Freyre incumbent Meets performance standards (9–0) | 2026 Annual 6 income sources, 4 assets, 2 colorado property, 1 offices and directorships, 1 state-regulated businesses, 2 debts | — | — | — | — |
Raised: contributions to the candidate's committee in TRACER over the election cycle (four years for statewide offices and the Senate, two for the House), with corrections applied. Their own: contributions and loans from the candidate. Candidates for Congress report to the FEC, and judges standing for retention don't raise money, so neither has figures here.