Colorado Files🔍 Search

People › Judges

Michael W.V. Angel

District Court Judge, 2nd Judicial District

Running in 2026: District Court Judge, 2nd Judicial District (November 3)

Judicial performance evaluation, 2026

Commission recommendation: Meets performance standards (10–0) · 10 of 10 commissioners voted “meets”

The commission's narrative

The Second Judicial District Commission on Judicial Performance unanimously agrees by a vote of 10-0 that Judge Michael W. V. Angel MEETS PERFORMANCE STANDARDS . The Colorado statutory judicial performance criteria are integrity, legal knowledge, communication skills, judicial temperament, administrative performance, and service to the legal profession and the public.

Judge Angel currently presides over criminal matters in the Denver District Court. Judge Angel meets all aspects of the performance criteria on which he is evaluated. The Commission found Judge Angel to be diligent, professional, and committed to growing as a judge. Judge Angel’s written decisions are clear, well-reasoned, and thorough. His notable strengths, as observed by the Commission and described in survey responses, include conducting himself in a fair and impartial manner, exceptional courtroom demeanor, and knowledge of the law. The Commission commends Judge Angel for his attention to pro se litigants in his previous domestic relations rotation to help ensure efficiency, fairness, and equity in legal proceedings. The Commission, based on its observation and analysis of survey responses, did not identify any evaluation category in which Judge Angel displayed a notable weakness as to the performance criteria. Judge Angel exceeded the Court’s productivity benchmark for criminal and domestic relations courtrooms.

The Commission met with the Chief Judge of Denver District Court to discuss challenges facing the court system and also met with the Denver District Attorney and a representative of the Denver Office of the Office of the Colorado State Public Defender regarding Judge Angel’s performance. The Commission conducted a personal interview with Judge Angel and observed him during court proceedings. It also reviewed opinions he authored, comments received from interested parties during the evaluation, case management data, and judicial performance survey responses from attorneys and non-attorneys who interacted with him. The surveys reflected personal opinions regarding Judge Angel in the categories of case management, application and knowledge of the law, communications, diligence, demeanor, and fairness. A total of 12 attorneys and 13 non-attorneys responded to the judicial performance surveys expressing their opinion of Judge Angel. The overall information and data reviewed supports the Commission’s recommendation that Judge Angel be meets performance standards.

Judge Angel was appointed to the Denver District Court in July 2024. Prior to his appointment, he served as a Magistrate Judge in Adams County, Seventeenth Judicial District. Judge Angel has also worked for a non-profit, representing low-income and indigent clients, practiced federal criminal defense, and worked as a deputy district attorney in rural and metro jurisdictions prior to his appointment as a Magistrate Judge. Judge Angel is a dedicated community volunteer who serves, among other roles, as Vice President of the District Court Judges Association and volunteers with the University of Denver Law School and judicial organizations. He received his undergraduate degree from Miami University in Oxford, Ohio and his law degree from Wake Forest University School of Law in Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

1300 Broadway, Suite 220 Denver, Colorado 80203

(303) 928-7777

The evaluation on judicialperformance.colorado.gov · 2026 Retention Survey Report (PDF) · 2025 Interim Survey Report (PDF)

From the state's Office of Judicial Performance Evaluation. A commission of citizens, attorneys and non-attorneys for each judicial district (the state commission for appellate judges) reviews each judge standing for retention and finds that they meet, or do not meet, performance standards. Voters decide.

Personal Financial Disclosures

Income listed: up to $425,000; debts: up to $467,000 on their latest disclosure with entries: the top of each range they selected, added up (the form asks for ranges, not amounts; a range with no top counts at its figure).

StatementFiledWhat it lists
2026
District Court Judge
2026-01-122 income sources, 6 assets, 1 colorado property, 6 debts
2025
District Court Judge
2025-01-083 income sources, 7 assets, 1 colorado property, 7 debts

Findings

None.

Gifts they reported

What Michael W.V. Angel listed on their quarterly reports of gifts, honoraria and other benefits since 2024: $564 across 1 item from 1 source. Givers who are clients of a registered lobbyist are marked.

FromWhat, whenValue
ABIGAIL BLACKBURN
$564 in all
WINTER COATS (TWO ADULT, TWO CHILDREN) WERE A GIFT FROM A FRIEND. · 2025-01-06$564

From the reports in TRACER (search them: Gifts and Honoraria Report). Officials file one each quarter in which they receive a reportable item (C.R.S. 24-6-203).